View Single Post
Old 11-20-2009, 10:46 AM   #10 (permalink)
7redorbs

 

Contribution: LVL20

Thread Clarity:
+54
Post Clarity:
+39

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: London
Posts: 877
Well, I didn't expect to be taken seriously, So I've emailed Hancock and Burisch, as weird as it sounds we all have some strange connection to egypt that started with a particular unnamed person.

I think some people are put here to make a difference to other peoples lives, and sometimes others can't always see that. If anyone can help straighten this enigma out and give the questions and contrasts I put in the main article article - then the proper 'pro' guys can. However I believe everyone has a mind to think, who was it who said experts should be banned?

GI: I'm not making assumptions but contrasting two peoples research, and my own, as well as NASA STS88 telemetry how is that an assumption? 75% of this article is talking about the establishment of paradigms, the history, and contrasting existing archaeological and alternative paradigms. I specifically don't make any assumptions but put challenging questions and facts about the archaeological status of the Abydos glyph to get people thinking,

The source of the STS 88 photo's is the NASA EOL JPL FTP site.

Although you are welcome to say I am talking nonsense I would appreciate some specificity, and although my article lacks exact specificity itself, that does not make it wrong, it makes it contrasting enough not to make silly assumptions, the EXACT thing that caused the abydos 'discreditation' in the first place, which is highly annoying; anyone who knows this topic well should see what I am trying to get at, I sincerely hope that others can see it and know it - and that is - the thought process - not assumption or conclusion but re-evaluation and question asking on broken theories being disproved now - and to me that cannot be anything but the opposite of nonsense.

A


ps. the only guilt or responsibility I can infer in the article would be the sensationalist headline and that would be because I genuinely believe it is sensational story, and in title is clearly where such sensationalism ends.. the rest is intent on careful comparisons and important questions, that are highly significant ones to be asking in my opinion.

pss. I am happy at least I've got peoples attention on the subject so, thanks very much for your feedback


7redorbs is offline   Reply With Quote