Thanks for your post, people who like my research philosophy and methods are like oases in a parched desert, a refreshment for my spirit. At the same time I am puzzled why you did not follow through to my other studies. Are they really so tedious, or incomprehensible?
Abydos is just a gateway to other sites. Success in resolving the nature of the Abydos Helicopter scene (it is a composition and not a palimpsest) sparked my interest in Giza, because in my view, it was the third encounter with an agency, which was also responsible for the Athena Engraving, one of fifteen-hundred Stone Age engravings found at La Marche, France, as well as for the Nazca Lines in Peru. Sounds insane and impossible, but I can prove it true. The Athena Engraving, and the nine-fingered Nazca monkey were created from the same geometric template - a sophisticated and highly specialized application of Golden Section, and associated geometry. It would be truly insane to think even for a moment that this could happen twice by accident.
If this Agency made it as far as Abydos, eleven-thousand years after La Marche, it was feasible to hypothesize that previously it had stopped over at Giza, and was responsible for the ground plan of the Great Giza Pyramids (as well, as their building). However, the Abydos anomaly is noticeably weaker composition-wise, and less sophisticated than Athena, or the monkey, as if the Agency along with it powers were gone, and only some keepers of watered-down secrets remained in the temples. Maybe the Abydos encounter with the Agency is second-hand, but it does show an array of modern craft just like the Athena Engraving (below, including a saucer with a pyramid inside, which is important, because the engraving is also deemed a palimpsest by archaeologists.
Skeptical at first, I was gradually convinced of the Agency creative presence at Giza. How much meaning can be hermetically concealed in just three squares? Well, a lot, definitely enough to powerfully bond Giza's ground plan to the design of Nazca Monkey, and hence the Athena Engraving, establishing an incredibly long time-line for the Agency. Giza's plan is based on what is the geometric culmination of the monkey - a lesson on how to perform the fastest, simplest construction of the 5-pointed star (thirteen steps). The difference is that the monkey glyph is quite open about it, while the Giza plan seems to hide it. Incidentally, internet searches did not yet bring up the equivalent of the 13-Step construction from the modern era for me.
It is noteworthy that Jim Alison contributes another direct relation between Nazca and Giza. The great Earth circle, which the two sites lay on, is divided by them in - what else - the Phi proportion.
Sure, the academy laughs at the idea of a unified site plan for Giza, and indeed, there have been so many proudly proposed, and widely diverging solutions for this problem that they could not possibly be all right. I get a kick out of all these authors uttering the magical formula "and the results are very close to the original", when in fact, they are atrociously off. On the other hand, one should not gloss over that some researchers did discover various interesting aspects of the layout. Anyhow, I am grateful for the ample competition, against which my Giza solution can be compared. The result? While all the other solutions are as a rule far more inaccurate than actual Egyptian work standards at Giza, my reconstruction of Petrie's Giza plan is microscopically precise, to fractions of a millimeter in each and every case.
Due to Giza's scale, the plan could not be worked out manually on even the largest drawing board, because various parallel lines and concentric circles drawn in the process of reconstruction would appear on it as single lines and circles instead. In the process each pyramid exists in an initial version, which then transforms into an exact duplicate of the Petrie version. The plan can only be worked out mathematically, but the calculations would present an extremely tough nut to crack for any mathematician without aid of modern calculators, or CAD programs.
The difficulty of this keeps in character with the difficulty of actually building the pyramids, or moving the biggest building blocks in history world at Baalbek, Lebanon. Our planet is quite blessed with magnificent works, which in my view are attributable to the Agency. Overall, there is a mountain of evidence for the Agency's existence since prehistory, to which my research contributes the only examples of actual mathematical works from the Agency. Naturally, skeptics deny it, and no one affirms it..
By the way, I wrote an article giving proof why Augustus, and his Roman Empire could not move the hyper-colossal Baalbek blocks. It, along with my Abydos Helicopter article, enjoys the largest readership, thousands of people on some days. Meanwhile, my most important study, everything I've done on the paleolithic Athena Engraving just collects dust . As a small consolation, there is a slow but regular trickle of visitors to my Nazca page, but it is impossible to have a true appreciation of Nazca Lines, Abydos Helicopter, or the Giza site-plan without absorbing Athena's system. These sites are connected by powerful bonds, and should be studied together.
Cheers, Jiri
cheers for the comments frog
Linear Mode
