Originally Posted by madprophet
Being that smart you'd think he'd have seen what was coming.
|
I have spent many years thinking on this, I have come to the conclusion there is a type of smartness that is so deep and questioning, it cares not of humour, it cares not of politics, and it cares , or he cares, not of himself.
You could say that balance is our undoing, but I think sometimes an unbalanced mind can journey into places that are much a mystery. Perhaps the irresistible yet insatiable mystery is all consuming, or perhaps, those who would venture to find it, do _because_ they have no concern, or awareness of politics.
He who knows not, knows something else. That doesn't make it good or bad alone as people do this all by themselves, I think though what it can do is make it fit information theory better. That is identity and psychological profiling of the genius. This surely is a thought of such profound wellwishing it would be more likely for an alien to beam down and congratulate steven hawkins, however, it bothers me greatly, could we all really be geniuses? That is incredibly good at something.. it is just when such a path is chosen, it is realised. The duality of the internal Idiom and the external admonitio of the external universe.
Could it be that the cosmografia del minor mondo isn't just a fancyable thing invented by delusional men whom believe in broken impossible feats of alchemy and magickal talismanic Egyptian mysteries whom which are claimed to lie deep within the psychological orifices of Pythagorean genius. I think so, but I sure as hell don't think that I care too much for the corporate politics game either.
As Jung said, any man who would complain about another, would be hard tried to say any one thing of the other's so called annoyances, without giving away all that is them.
Just that.. division as implied connectiveness, it's the same to me - but others may require a translator from Zeta Reticulae, and that is not a philosophical unfair entendré, it's just an unfortunate efficacy of deep philosophical thought.
As Dennis Mckenna says, as the surface area of knowledge increases, the surface area of assumption squares. But where is wisdom in this? Lost, surely, only left for others one day to find and reclaim as their own.
I am enjoying this, Many regards,
A
Added to our video's section, will get back to you on what I think once I've watched it thoroughly 
Linear Mode
